Sennheiser CX 200 II Earphones Review 2022

It’s not that you shouldn’t purchase them since consumers seem to like them, but if you’re looking for something a little bit better overall, go no further than the Sennheiser CX 175 earbuds from a year ago.

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ See Current Price

✅ Best Sennheiser CX200 Twist-to-Fit Earbuds

Highly recommended for melodic/technical genres – These provide a great sound for jazz bass & metal. While it may not be a perfectly flat response, these have a good balance. Music is crisp and clear, with mids being easy to understand, highs being crisp, and lows carrying force without being “hip hop” boomy. If you want something to boom bass into your ears, look elsewhere. If you listen to music that has dynamic melodies and a wide range of tones and instruments, these sound as good as a set of ear cans

Positives

• Good earphones for your average user.

Negatives

• Not suitable for walking or running, not long lasting either.

Editor Rating

Does Newer Mean Better?

The Sennheiser CX 200 II Earphones are the next model up in the Sennheiser CX 175 series, and they are significantly different in terms of technology. Nonetheless, the CX 200 II has a more conventional frequency response with 20hz (average bass) and 20kHz (standard treble); however, anything greater than 20kHz in treble will not be audible.

The sound pressure rating is lower than that of the CX 175s, at 121db, and it rises to a maximum level of 110db before dropping. Without intending to harm your hearing, you would never want to listen at a level greater than 85db under any circumstances. Last but not least, the harmonic distortion is around 2%, which is 1% greater than the CX 175 and will degrade the audio quality of the CX 200 II when compared to the CX 175’s.

What Do People Think?

The most significant drawback was that these headphones were not as robust as Duracell batteries, with 1/5 of users reporting that they broke within the first two months of use. This was mainly due to a faulty earpiece, and Sennheiser was unhelpful when customers requested for a replacement or a refund, despite the fact that the product comes with a two-year warranty on workmanship. These earphones, like the CX 175s, are not suited for running or walking since the cable scrapes against the skin and generates an uncomfortable noise; if you’re searching for jogging headphones, check out our post on the ‘best earphones for running’.

The majority of people were delighted with the build quality and thought they were superior than the usual White iPod earbuds. In truth, experienced listeners considered them to be ordinary, and although the bass enhancement was noticeable, it was not something that Sennheiser should have touted as a feature. It’s not that you shouldn’t purchase them since consumers seem to like them, but if you’re looking for something a little bit better overall, go no further than the Sennheiser CX 175 earbuds from a year ago.

Left earbud died after 2 months of daily gentle use. Up until that happened, the sound quality was really good and they were really comfortable.

On the packaging it states bass driven sound but this seems very weak. I was expecting a much better sound. I will not be buying any more products by Sennheiser on this evidence.

Earphones are nice and comfortable, also seem to fit snugly.

I bought these headphones to replace my Ipod headphones after they decided to fall apart on me, and apon hearing my music though these babies, I strongly recommend them! Especially over the tacky Ipod ones!